Heather Culbert: Canadian President of “Doctors Without Borders” is an ABORTIONIST

Heather Culbert – Doctors Without Frontiers “dirty secret” 


Heather Culbert is an abortionist. Culbert is also President of Medecins Sans Frontiers/Doctors without Borders (CANADA). 

This information was revealed at the trial of Mary Wagner, a Canadian pro-life activist.

On June 9th, the Judge ruled that the name of Culbert can be revealed. In desperation, the Crown sought an “emergency” application to attempt to enforce a permanent ban was heard on June 13th. A final ruling will be issued on June 29th.

Obviously the Crown is very concerned to suppress the fact of Culbert’s intimate association with Doctors Without Borders.

  No matter what the courts decide, they cannot strip from the public the following public documentation: Culbert’s name and her “primary practice location” – lo and behold! – the Bloor West Village Women’s Clinic!


The Homo-Jesuits of the Jesuit Post: how the Jesuits are promoting homosexuality

Pro-sodomy article by Welle S. J.

The Jesuit Post is another notorious pro-sodomite publication. It regularly publishes pro-homosexual propaganda. Recently it published two articles by a Jesuit Scholastic (meaning this man is studying to be ordained as a Jesuit priest) Jason Welle,  S. J. They may be read here and here. 

Welle wrote an article for the Jesuit Post supporting sodomy; supporting intrinsically evil acts. Supporting one of the four sins that cry to Heaven for vengeance. Yet, Welle is going to be ordained (his ordination, if it followed the norms laid down according to law, would be valid, but it certainly would be illicit. c.f. Canon 1040. 2 ” His Ordinand would also, if he knew of Welle’s position, would objectively commit a grave mortal sin in ordaining him c.f. canon 1050. 3).

Fitzmaurice with two practicing homosexuals

Welle also interviewed an Arthur Fitzmaurice. From what can be gathered Fitzmaurice is an open supporter of sodomy. On his Facebook page he poses with two men who are going to be “married”. Is this Catholic? Is this the type of man that a candidate for the priesthood should consult on how to lovingly draw these poor men and women baxck to the Faith, to Confession, to repentance?

Welle S.J.’s interview is but propaganda. Why does he not ask Fitzmaurice if his “ministry” is faithful to the Church’s teaching (such as Courage); that homosexuals are to remain celibate; that they are to be loved as persons who are afflicted with same-sex attraction which is a cross to bare. There is a huge difference between what a person is, and what a person does. Between being and acting.  

Fitzmaurice being interviewed by Welle, S.J.

The answer lies in the fact that both men are open dissenters: both are in favor of homosexual activity. Both not only support perverted sexual acts, but wish these same acts to be the basis of,  accepted as “marriage” and equated to the chaste love between husband and wife, which is a reflection of the union between Christ and His Church. Quickly one can see that “same-sex marriage” is sacrilegious in intent.

A gloating Welle S.J., after the Supreme court ruling in favor of sodomy

Welle S .J., writes in his heresy riddled homosexualist screed, “Love Hurts” the following, just after the US Supreme Court decreed that perverse sexual activity between two men or two women constitutes marriage.

I know there continue to be objections form those who believe that gay and lesbian relationships are immoral  or that same-sex marriages can simply not be recognized as proper marriages, fellow Catholics and other Americans of good will among them”.

You will notice the condescending dismissal of those who uphold Christian morality coming to us from Our Lord, through His Church.

Reese S. J., homosexualist dissenter

Yet imagine: a man who wrote heresy, that unmitigated evil is deemed fit to be ordained by his Jesuit superiors (are they homo? or being blacked mailed by homos? – these are logical questions), and will be presented to a bishop for ordination. The bishop either knowingly (is he a homo? or black mailed?) or unknowingly will ordain him (in which, those Jesuit homosexualist deceivers commit a grave sin).

Vatican Radio: “Same-sex marriage” officiator Conan O’Brien is included in poster with the Pope

Vatican Radio – English section is now promoting “Joke with the Pope”.  This is a shocking manifestation of lack of respect for the Vicar of Christ. The Pope is the representative of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. He is not a comedian, nor a celebrity.

If this is not bad enough, Vatican Radio carries a poster which includes the Pope and an American homosexualist, Conan O’Brien who “officiated” (yes, he joined a heretical sect to do so thereby completing his heresy with apostasy), at a so-called “wedding” of two homosexuals. This is truly evil.

Screenshot (472)

Our Lord is permitting His Church to be scourged by these unfaithful apostate churchmen, who are serving satan. Do not forget: Israel was scourged again and again for infidelity. Christ still loves us, that is why He is punishing us. That we repent and return.

Fr. Thomas Rosica: uses “Laudato Si” to question the Faith of “climate denier” Catholics, but remains silent on pro-abortion “Catholic” politicians

Fr. Thomas Rosica of the Congregation of St. Basil, CEO of Salt and Light Media Foundation, English Language Assistant to the Holy See Press Office, was interviewed on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation for his views of the Pope’s latest encyclical (the CBC employee claimed it was his first – wrong! – it is his second), Laduato Si. 

After the initial  meanderings, things really get interesting with Heather Hiscox bringing up a number of Republican Presidential candidates as possibly bad Catholics, since they deny and/or question the genesis of global warming. (disclaimer: I too question anthropocentric warming. Do I fall under Fr. Rosica’s judgment that somehow I do not follow the moral teachings of the Church and Popes.? More on this later).  The epithet, “Climate deniers” was the slander that Hiscox threw at these men.

Rather than clarify to Hiscox that a disputed question of science does not fall under Faith and Morals (does anyone remember their history when churchmen thought they knew science?), rather than correct her on her erroneous belief that science is static (when, by nature science  is questioning, changing, evolving – hence, the very reason why Pope Pius XII did not commit to the “Big Bang Theory”. Simply because today’s science is tomorrow’s error), Fr. Rosica indulged her prejudices.

It would be a disconcerting interview simply if the English language Spokesman for the Holy See Press Office, as an educated priest, showed a deplorable lack of understanding about the philosophy of science. But it gets worse, far worse. 

Jumping on the bone thrown by Hiscox, Fr. Rosica proceedes to berate, deride and mock a number of pro-life Republican candidates for the office of President of the United States. Is it now Holy See Press Office policy to meddle in the internal workings of independent nations? For this serious indiscretion alone, Fr. Rosica should be removed as spokesman. But it gets worse, far, far worse. 

After naming them: Jeb Bush, Rick Santorum: Fr. Rosica proceeds to question these men’s Catholic Faith. Why? Because they have been identified by the modernist “inquisition” as non-believers in a disputed question of science? Rosica intones:

“those who claim to be Catholic in the political world, sometimes don’t have any understanding of the moral teaching of the Church and the moral teaching of Popes…”

Yet not ONE word about pro-abortion “Catholic” politicians, not one word about pro-homosexual “Catholic” politicians. Why? Is it not pro-abortion and pro-homosexual candidates par excellence who dont’ have any understanding…?

And yet, Fr. Rosica is silent on this. 

Why Fr. Rosica? Pope after Pope have decried the evil of abortion and yet you remained silent. Silent!

Your silence is scandalous.  

Yet God draws good from evil, for your own words condemn the pro-abortion and pro-homosexual politicians. And they condemn those who have dissented from the doctrinal teaching on morals in Humanae Vitae.

And they condemn you. 

Fr. Michael Bechard’s Facebook/Twitter pages: are they appropriate for a Catholic priest?

Warning: the following post contains graphic images and vulgar/obscene language. 

Fr. Micheal Bechard is a priest for the Diocese of London, Ontario. Facebook is a very public social networking site. His Facebook page contains amongst other things: the support of dissenting nuns,  nude (what some would consider homoerotic) images,  images and links that contain vulgar expletives such as “sh_t” and “assh_les”, links to youtube videos by someone known as “The Rebel Fag”, (these videos contain the image of a muscular young man; again usually known in as “homoerotic”) … On his Twitter page he has retweets containing the swear word: “fu_k”.

Screenshot (43)
Michael Bechard as Diocesan Director of Liturgy

We report; you decide:

Is it appropriate for a Catholic priest to advocate and sign a petition in favour of dissent?


Is it appropriate for a Catholic priest to link to op-eds, articles on so-called “gay rights” that affirm the homosexual lifestyle?


Is it appropriate for a Catholic priest to endorse the dissenter on homosexuality, Timothy Radcliffe?


Is it appropriate for a Catholic priest to use the word “fu_k”?


Is it appropriate for a Catholic priest to use the word “sh-t”? here….

Screenshot (50)

…. and retweet “sh_t” here?


Is it appropriate for a Catholic priest to use the word “assh-les”?


Is it appropriate for a Catholic priest to link to youtube videos containing a “homoerotic” image by “The Rebel Fag”; with the vulgar addition of: “dance your asses off”?


Is it appropriate for a Catholic priest to upload a link to a video with a song from an album whose title is taken from the homosexual sado-masochistic and bondage parade, known as the “Folsom Street Fair”?


Is it appropriate for a Catholic priest to upload homoerotic images to his Facebook page?




Is it appropriate for a Catholic priest to question blogs because they uphold Catholic moral teachings on sexuality?


To conclude: is it appropriate for this same Catholic priest to be appointed and remain as director of liturgy of a diocese? Is it appropriate for this same priest to be designated by the bishop as the authority on placement of the Tabernacle?Is it appropriate for this same priest to hold public ministry?